Analisis Strategi Pemilihan Vendor dalam Rangka Pengadaan Mobil Truk dengan Metode AHP pada PT Iron Bird Logistics

Authors

  • Sri Handoko Sakti Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia
  • Junaidi Hendro Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia
  • Muhammad Natser Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61402/sajmr.v4i1.559

Keywords:

Analytical Hierarchy Process, AHP, Vendor Selection, Truck Procurement, Logistics, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the best truck vendor for PT Iron Bird Logistics by applying the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The research focuses on developing a strategic framework that integrates various qualitative and quantitative criteria into the vendor selection process. The methodology employs a case study approach, collecting primary data through questionnaires and in-depth interviews with relevant experts and managers within the company. The AHP method was applied by constructing a criteria hierarchy consisting of Quality, Cost, After-Sales Service, and Technology. The data were analyzed using Expert Choice software to calculate criteria weights and evaluate the seven pre-selected vendors.

The analysis results show that the Quality criterion has the highest weight (0.425), followed by Cost (0.285), After-Sales Service (0.185), and Technology (0.105). Of the seven vendors evaluated, Vendor D achieved the highest score (0.218) and was determined to be the best vendor. The consistency ratio (CR) test yielded a value of 0.03 (< 0.1), indicating a consistent assessment. The value of this research lies in its practical contribution to the application of the AHP method for truck vendor selection, particularly in Indonesian logistics companies. The resulting framework offers a systematic and comprehensive approach that can be adopted by similar companies for strategic decision-making in fleet procurement.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 3872-3885.

Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2019). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16-24.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

Wang, C. N., Nguyen, V. T., Thai, H. T., & Duong, D. H. (2020). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for solar power plant location selection in Vietnam. Energies, 13(3), 1-21.

Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. H., & O'Brien, C. (2006). A weighted max-min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(2), 394-407.

Chan, F. T., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M. K., Lau, H. C., & Choy, K. L. (2008). Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46(14), 3825-3857.

Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289-301.

Ghodsypour, S. H., & O'Brien, C. (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. *International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57*, 199-212.

Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66-83.

Kannan, D., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 432-447.

Kumar, A., & Roy, S. (2019). Supplier selection in supply chain management using AHP and ELECTRE method. International Journal of Procurement Management, 12(1), 1-21.

Lin, C. W., Chen, H. Y., & Nguyen, H. T. (2018). A comprehensive supplier selection model using AHP and DEMATEL. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 35(5), 315-327.

Liu, J., Ding, F. Y., & Lall, V. (2000). Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(3), 143-150.

Mendoza, A., & Ventura, J. A. (2012). Analytical techniques for supplier selection: A review. Journal of Applied Business Research, 28(3), 539-550.

Parthiban, P., Zubar, H. A., & Katakar, P. (2012). Vendor selection problem: a multi-criteria approach based on strategic decisions. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 3016-3030.

Pitchipoo, P., Venkumar, P., & Rajakarunakaran, S. (2013). Fuzzy hybrid decision model for supplier evaluation and selection. International Journal of Production Research, 51(13), 3903-3919.

Ramanathan, R. (2007). Supplier selection problem: integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(4), 258-261.

Sarkar, A., & Mohapatra, P. K. (2006). Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: A method for supply base reduction. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(3), 148-163.

Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8182-8192.

Singh, R. K., & Benyoucef, L. (2011). A fuzzy TOPSIS based approach for e-sourcing. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24(8), 1398-1413.

Ting, S. C., & Cho, D. I. (2008). An integrated approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 116-127.

Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2016). A dynamic feedback model for partner selection in agile supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(5), 558-576.

Yeh, W. C., & Chuang, M. C. (2011). Using multi-objective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4244-4253.

Zeydan, M., Colpan, C., & Cobanoglu, C. (2011). A combined methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2741-2751.

Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2008). An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection—An application oriented to lead-time reduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 763-781.

Jääskeläinen, A., & Thitz, O. (2019). Supplier selection in logistics services: A process-based approach. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(2), 710-733.

Kumar, M., Vrat, P., & Shankar, R. (2004). A fuzzy programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 101(2), 273-285.

Lima-Junior, F. R., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2016). Combining SCOR model and fuzzy TOPSIS for supplier evaluation and management. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, 128-141.

Park, J., Shin, K., Chang, T. W., & Park, J. (2010). An integrative framework for supplier relationship management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(4), 495-515.

Sanni, S. A., & Hashim, M. (2019). Critical criteria for supplier selection in the Nigerian logistics industry: An AHP approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 12(2), 221-235.

Tavana, M., Yazdani, M., & Di Caprio, D. (2017). An application of an integrated ANP–QFD framework for sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(3), 254-275.

Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), 2-18.

Wu, T., & Blackhurst, J. (2009). Supplier evaluation and selection: an integrated decision-making approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47(16), 4591-4609.

Zhang, J., & Zhang, M. (2011). Supplier selection and purchase problem with fixed cost and constrained order quantities under stochastic demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 129(1), 1-7.

Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.

Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications.

Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 85-91.

Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29.

Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process—a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16(4), 96-108.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-22

How to Cite

Sri Handoko Sakti, Junaidi Hendro, & Muhammad Natser. (2026). Analisis Strategi Pemilihan Vendor dalam Rangka Pengadaan Mobil Truk dengan Metode AHP pada PT Iron Bird Logistics. SAJMR : Southeast Asian Journal of Management and Research, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.61402/sajmr.v4i1.559

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.